指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #98 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.490 | 2/2 | 3.32s |
| #99 | Ling 3.1 Flash medium | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 3.57s |
| #100 | Qwen3.7 Plus medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.415 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #101 | Gemini 4 Argon low | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.438 | 2/2 | 2.40s | |
| #102 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.757 | 2/2 | 1.73s |
| #103 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 2/2 | 6.23s |
| #104 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.007 | 2/2 | 7.90s |
| #105 | GPT-5.6 Terra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.483 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #106 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.271 | 2/2 | 7.26s |
| #107 | Kimi K3.1 Pro high | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.646 | 2/2 | 5.71s |
| #108 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 12.2s |
| #110 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.636 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #111 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 high | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.261 | 2/2 | 15.4s |
| #112 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash low | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.494 | 2/2 | 8.38s |
| #113 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.118 | 2/2 | 1.79s |