通用智能 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 通用智能 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
319/319
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 通用智能 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #71 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.188 | 1/1 | 12.9s |
| #130 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 3.4 | 7.1 | $1.207 | 0/1 | 34.1s |
| #149 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 5.5 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 0/1 | 4.17s |
| #124 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.247 | 1/1 | 17.8s |
| #16 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 1/1 | 5.17s |
| #146 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 4.6 | 6.9 | $1.273 | 0/1 | 36.4s |
| #9 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $1.289 | 1/1 | 3.11s |
| #45 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 6.1 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 0/1 | 10.7s |
| #18 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 1/1 | 11.8s | |
| #46 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 1/1 | 4.41s |
| #37 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.469 | 1/1 | 7.95s |
| #43 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 1/1 | 2.87s |
| #24 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 1/1 | 41.8s |
| #97 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 1/1 | 3.70s |
| #50 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 4.7 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 0/1 | 4.92s |