编程 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 编程 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↑.
408/408
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 编程 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #87 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 3/3 | 155.2s |
| #111 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 0.8 | 0.8 | $2.996 | 2/3 | 155.7s |
| #90 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.271 | 2/3 | 156.7s |
| #318 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 0.5 | 0.5 | $0.092 | 1/3 | 159.0s |
| #108 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 1/3 | 160.5s |
| #102 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | $1.135 | 1/3 | 160.7s |
| #134 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.306 | 1/3 | 163.3s |
| #346 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.108 | 0/3 | 167.5s |
| #308 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning high | NVIDIA | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.168 | 0/3 | 168.4s |
| #377 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 170.7s |
| #71 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 0.8 | 0.8 | $4.016 | 2/3 | 172.5s |
| #376 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 177.7s |
| #246 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.862 | 2/3 | 179.0s |
| #150 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.7 | $0.567 | 1/3 | 180.7s |
| #333 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.683 | 0/3 | 183.9s |