反AI技巧 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 反AI技巧 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
311/311
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 反AI技巧 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #45 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 4/4 | 10.8s |
| #228 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 6.0 | 5.6 | $1.745 | 0/4 | 129.6s |
| #36 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 7.1 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 2/4 | 6.00s |
| #27 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 8.2 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 3/4 | 47.0s |
| #12 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 4/4 | 14.4s |
| #49 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 8.2 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 3/4 | 28.2s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 4/4 | 3.95s |
| #7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.4 | $2.011 | 4/4 | 2.57s | |
| #43 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 4/4 | 23.5s |
| #219 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 8.7 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 3/4 | 37.2s | |
| #78 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.8 | $2.089 | 4/4 | 3.30s |
| #75 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 6.5 | 7.8 | $2.126 | 2/4 | 2.98s |
| #24 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 4/4 | 5.67s |
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 7.5 | 8.0 | $2.253 | 2/4 | 8.60s |
| #245 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 7.5 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 3/3 | 43.9s |