AI BENCHY
Comparar Gráficos Metodologia
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Falhas por categoria AI BENCHY

Específico do domínio
Resposta incorreta

Veja quais modelos de IA têm mais chance de encontrar Resposta incorreta em Específico do domínio, para identificar pontos fracos mais rápido.

Modelos exibidos

53

Falhas totais

98

Modelo mais afetado

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3
Posição Modelo Empresa Contagem de Resposta incorreta Pontuação da categoria Testes corretos Tempo de resposta (médio)
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 63.4s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 3 10.0 0/3 4.21s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 13.0s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 3 10.0 0/3 2.24s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 3 10.0 0/3 1.61s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 3 10.0 0/3 6.48s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 50.9s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 540ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 637ms
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 64.3s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 7.01s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 2 4.0 1/3 127.6s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 74.3s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 2 4.0 1/3 170.5s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 0ms
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 17.8s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 37.3s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 2.36s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 96.0s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 2 4.0 1/3 942ms
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 2 10.0 0/3 137.3s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 1.17s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 2 10.0 0/3 44.6s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 2 4.0 1/3 495ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 465ms
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 2 10.0 0/3 237.3s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 1.07s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 2 4.0 1/3 877ms
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 2 4.0 1/3 4.38s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 962ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 638ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 2 4.0 1/3 534ms
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 174.6s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 2 4.0 1/3 1.06s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 564ms
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 1 7.0 2/3 32.7s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 17.5s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 79.5s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 0ms
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 1 4.0 1/3 39.3s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 1 7.0 2/3 963ms
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 146.5s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 1 7.0 2/3 3.54s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 83.4s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 77.8s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 1 4.0 1/3 121.8s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 204.0s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 1 10.0 0/3 88.3s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 905ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 485ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 1 7.0 2/3 744ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 1 4.0 1/3 287ms

Melhores modelos por Contagem de Resposta incorreta

Contagem de Resposta incorreta vs pontuação média

Melhores modelos por Tempo de resposta (médio)

Melhores modelos por Custo desperdiçado estimado