#39 Qwen3.6 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 29.9s
- Tokens
- 6,784 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Samenvatting
Benchmarkvergelijking Qwen3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: De gemiddelde score is vrijwel gelijk met 7.5 vs 7.5. MiMo-V2.5-Pro heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.106 vs $0.288. Qwen3.6 Flash is sneller met 19.25s vs 26.13s, met slagingspercentages van 71.4% vs 68.3%.
Aanbevolen model: MiMo-V2.5-Pro - Het heeft hier de beste score (7.5) en kost ongeveer 2.7x minder dan Qwen3.6 Flash.
Benchmarks gegenereerd uit AI BENCHY-testsuites op: 2026-06-04
| Metriek | Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium | MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Rang | #39 | #43 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistentie | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 71.4% | 68.3% |
| Instabiele tests | 5 | 4 |
| Totaal runs | 63 | 63 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 3.030 | 2.541 |
| Totale kosten | $0.288 | $0.106 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.188 / 1M | $0.435 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $1.125 / 1M | $0.870 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 42,362 | 40,854 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 2,995 | 5,015 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 245,358 | 97,742 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 19.25s | 26.13s |
| Responstijd (max) | 122.87s | 130.77s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 404.20s | 548.65s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#43 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.10s | 672 | 624 | 14,024 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.26s | 621 | 323 | 1,179 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 5.0 | 5.1 | 44.5% | 2 | 42.85s | 7,895 | 495 | 67,967 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 6.2 | 4.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 92.07s | 6,543 | 780 | 51,218 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.28s | 14,934 | 483 | 13,839 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 53.36s | 15,060 | 348 | 11,870 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.65s | 7,782 | 270 | 13,155 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 18.81s | 7,746 | 260 | 8,383 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 14.65s | 771 | 60 | 24,409 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 37.87s | 630 | 275 | 17,023 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 4.8 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.88s | 516 | 140 | 5,445 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.02s | 492 | 155 | 163 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.05s | 699 | 102 | 7,423 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.77s | 672 | 82 | 803 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 6.29s | 696 | 460 | 10,860 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 6.7 | 7.9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5.31s | 660 | 540 | 2,181 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.00s | 8,193 | 335 | 1,188 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.87s | 8,220 | 311 | 2,908 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 122.87s | 204 | 26 | 87,048 | |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 12.46s | 210 | 1,941 | 2,014 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMiMo-V2.5-Promedium