- Rang
- #288
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 932,619
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 75.86s
- Totale kosten
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Ling-2.6-flash
Ling-2.6-flash leidt in gemiddelde score met 4.9 vs 4.8. Ling-2.6-flash heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.002 vs $0.592. Ling-2.6-flash is sneller met 10.71s vs 75.86s, met slagingspercentages van 39.4% vs 30.3%.
Vergeleken modellen
- Rang
- #282
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 14,903
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 10.71s
- Totale kosten
- $0.002
Aanbevolen model
Ling-2.6-flash
Het heeft hier de beste score (4.9) en kost ongeveer 371.7x minder dan Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Gedetailleerde vergelijking
| Metriek | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.9 |
| Rang | #288 | #282 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistentie | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Pogingen | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 39.4% | 30.3% |
| Instabiele tests | 8 | 2 |
| Totaal runs | 66 | 66 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 12.473 | 0.024 |
| Totale kosten | $0.592 | $0.002 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.250 / 1M | $0.010 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.800 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 101,776 | 114,384 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 276,367 | 14,903 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 656,252 | 0 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 75.86s | 10.71s |
| Responstijd (max) | 510.21s | 36.03s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 1668.93s | 214.28s |
| Parameters | 398B totaal (13B actief) | 104B totaal (7.4B actief) |
| Beschikbaarheid | Gewichten beschikbaar | Open-source |
Model generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#288 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Kosten
- $0.028
- Tijd
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#282 Ling-2.6-flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowGratis beschikbaarTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneGratis beschikbaarLing-2.6-flashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowGratis beschikbaarTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowGratis beschikbaar