Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Model yang Dibandingkan

Perbandingan benchmark Qwen3.8 27B (high) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs Qwen3.8 27B: Qwen3.8 27B (high) unggul pada Skor dengan 8.4. Qwen3.8 27B (low) unggul pada Keandalan dengan 10.0. Qwen3.8 27B memiliki Total Biaya terendah di ~$0.006. Qwen3.8 27B paling cepat di 3.12s.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-15

Peringkat
#42
Total token output
656,635
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
167.89s
Total Biaya
~$0.287
Peringkat
#68
Total token output
136,162
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
33.05s
Total Biaya
~$0.058
Peringkat
#61
Total token output
169,329
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
39.11s
Total Biaya
~$0.071
Peringkat
#214
Total token output
11,445
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
3.12s
Total Biaya
~$0.006
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.8 27B

It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.5), lower cost than model lain dalam perbandingan ini, and balanced response time.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Rilis: 2026-08-14 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Rilis: 2026-08-14 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Rilis: 2026-08-14 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B none Rilis: 2026-08-14
Skor 8.4 7.8 7.9 5.5
Peringkat #42 #68 #61 #214
Keandalan 9.6 9.6 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.2 9.7 10.0 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 77.3% 66.7% 68.2% 40.9%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1 0 0
Total Run 66 66 66 66
Biaya per hasil ~1.792 ~0.409 ~0.473 ~0.063
Total Biaya ~$0.287 ~$0.058 ~$0.071 ~$0.006
Harga input T/A T/A T/A T/A
Harga output T/A T/A T/A T/A
Total token input 100,179 98,266 99,705 122,463
Token output 904 1,861 1,545 11,445
Token penalaran 655,731 134,301 167,784 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 167.89s 33.05s 39.11s 3.12s
Waktu respons (maks) 640.85s 214.63s 376.04s 44.76s
Waktu respons (total) 3693.54s 694.04s 860.51s 68.69s
Parameter 27.3B 27.3B 27.3B 27.3B
Ketersediaan Bobot tersedia Bobot tersedia Bobot tersedia Bobot tersedia

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Biaya
~$0.008
Waktu
270.1s
Token
18,963 tok

#68 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Biaya
~$0.002
Waktu
43.4s
Token
2,956 tok

#61 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Biaya
~$0.003
Waktu
92.8s
Token
6,902 tok

#214 Qwen3.8 27B

none
Biaya
~$0.001
Waktu
23.9s
Token
1,922 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
Qwen3.8 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.19s 7,911 408 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighQwen3.8 27BhighvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.8 27BlowvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 27BlowClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumKimi K3maxvsQwen3.8 27BlowNemotron 3.5 LightninghighTersedia gratisvsQwen3.8 27BnoneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsQwen3.8 27BnoneQwen3.8 27BhighvsGrok 4.6mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsQwen3.8 27BlowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.8 27Bmedium