Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.4 vs 5.3. Laguna XS 2.1 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.127. Laguna XS 2.1 lebih cepat di 1.55s vs 111.61s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 27.3% vs 30.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 17.8x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-22

Metrik Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Rilis: 2026-07-21 Tersedia gratis Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 5.4 5.3
Peringkat #167 #168
Keandalan 9.9 10.0
Konsistensi 8.1 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 27.3% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 5 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 3.153 0.143
Total Biaya $0.127 $0.008
Harga input $0.100 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.200 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 208,931 91,598
Token output 175,588 13,377
Token penalaran 409,276 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 111.61s 1.55s
Waktu respons (maks) 1190.11s 19.02s
Waktu respons (total) 2455.39s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
6.8s
Token
1,389 tok

#168 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
27.6s
Token
4,344 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan