Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.1 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.019 vs $0.106. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B lebih cepat di 12.72s vs 21.91s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 50.0% vs 43.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikangpt-oss-120b (medium)It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 5.6x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Rilis: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.1 6.1
Peringkat #115 #120
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.0 8.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 50.0% 43.9%
Tes tidak stabil 5 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.221 1.578
Total Biaya $0.019 $0.106
Harga input $0.037 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Harga output $0.170 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total token input 108,747 134,521
Token output 29,772 86,614
Token penalaran 68,044 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 21.91s 12.72s
Waktu respons (maks) 68.16s 209.15s
Waktu respons (total) 328.70s 279.90s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
26.7s
Token
555 tok

#120 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
28.4s
Token
4,518 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan