#9 GPT-5.5
low- Biaya
- $0.068
- Waktu
- 37.0s
- Token
- 2,339 tok
OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5
GPT-5.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.3 vs 7.7. GLM 5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.307 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) lebih cepat di 10.13s vs 33.54s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 86.4% vs 78.8%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.5 (low)It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 3.3x faster than GLM 5 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25
| Metrik | GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low | GLM 5 GLM 5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.3 | 7.7 |
| Peringkat | #9 | #49 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 86.4% | 78.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.594 | 1.668 |
| Total Biaya | $1.253 | $0.307 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.950 / 1M |
| Harga output | $30.000 / 1M | $2.551 / 1M |
| Total token input | 80,058 | 35,224 |
| Token output | 5,378 | 21,570 |
| Token penalaran | 23,040 | 102,996 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 10.13s | 33.54s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 56.19s | 99.85s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 222.82s | 435.99s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#49 GLM 5
medium- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 20.7s
- Token
- 2,068 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.6 LunahighvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsGLM 5mediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5highvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5mediumvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5nonevsGLM 5mediumGPT-5.5lowvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3.5 FlashhighvsGPT-5.5lowGPT-5.3 ChatnonevsGLM 5medium