Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.5 vs 6.3. Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.068 vs $0.116. Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) lebih cepat di 47.93s vs 75.38s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 68.2% vs 42.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 1.7x less than Gemma 4 31B (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Metrik Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Rilis: 2026-04-02 Tersedia gratis Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 6.3 6.5
Peringkat #121 #112
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.0 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 68.2% 42.4%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.044 0.746
Total Biaya $0.116 $0.068
Harga input $0.140 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.400 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 94,992 118,989
Token output 34,468 30,750
Token penalaran 223,278 491,833
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 75.38s 47.93s
Waktu respons (maks) 437.40s 422.72s
Waktu respons (total) 1507.52s 1054.49s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
45.7s
Token
2,696 tok

#112 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
30.6s
Token
4,678 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan