Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.058 vs $0.068. Qwen3.5-27B lebih cepat di 4.76s vs 47.93s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 42.4% vs 40.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while responding about 10.1x faster than Laguna XS 2.1 (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.5 6.5
Peringkat #97 #98
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 42.4% 40.9%
Tes tidak stabil 1 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.746 0.763
Total Biaya $0.068 $0.058
Harga input $0.060 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Harga output $0.120 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total token input 118,989 102,316
Token output 30,750 24,321
Token penalaran 491,833 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 47.93s 4.76s
Waktu respons (maks) 422.72s 69.46s
Waktu respons (total) 1054.49s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
30.6s
Token
4,678 tok

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Biaya
$0.007
Waktu
42.9s
Token
4,273 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan