Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.8 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.090 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) lebih cepat di 2.65s vs 4.76s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.2% vs 40.9%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)It has the best score here (6.8), while responding about 1.8x faster than Qwen3.5-27B.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Rilis: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.8 6.5
Peringkat #87 #100
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 65.2% 40.9%
Tes tidak stabil 1 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 2.138 0.763
Total Biaya $0.300 $0.090
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Harga output $9.000 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Total token input 100,753 102,316
Token output 16,454 24,321
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.65s 4.76s
Waktu respons (maks) 25.26s 69.46s
Waktu respons (total) 58.27s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Biaya
$0.041
Waktu
20.4s
Token
4,608 tok

#100 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Biaya
$0.007
Waktu
42.9s
Token
4,273 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan