#88 Gemini 3.5 Flash
minimal- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 20.4s
- Token
- 4,608 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.8 vs 6.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.108 vs $0.220. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) lebih cepat di 1.57s vs 10.81s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 68.3% vs 71.4%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Peringkat | #88 | #89 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 68.3% | 71.4% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 7 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.767 | 1.992 |
| Total Biaya | $0.108 | $0.220 |
| Harga input | $1.500 / 1M | $0.740 / 1M |
| Harga output | $9.000 / 1M | $2.960 / 1M |
| Total token input | 39,847 | 42,749 |
| Token output | 5,277 | 63,338 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 1.57s | 10.81s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 5.51s | 53.57s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 33.02s | 227.02s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5.6 | 9.9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2.75s | 8,122 | 3,456 | 0 | |
| KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 | 6.1 | 4.7 | 66.7% | 2 | 22.52s | 7,893 | 22,440 | 0 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan