Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.5 vs 6.5. Laguna XS 2.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.068 vs $0.621. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) lebih cepat di 16.26s vs 47.93s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 59.1% vs 42.4%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 9.3x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Rilis: 2026-05-08 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 medium Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 6.5 6.5
Peringkat #100 #97
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.2 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 59.1% 42.4%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 5.170 0.746
Total Biaya $0.621 $0.068
Harga input $0.250 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $1.500 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 94,224 118,989
Token output 7,759 30,750
Token penalaran 390,126 491,833
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 16.26s 47.93s
Waktu respons (maks) 318.02s 422.72s
Waktu respons (total) 357.64s 1054.49s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
4.0s
Token
1,479 tok

#97 Laguna XS 2.1

medium
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
30.6s
Token
4,678 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Laguna XS 2.1 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 70.35s 7,995 23,767 83,258

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan