Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.9 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.002 vs $0.831. Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) lebih cepat di 10.11s vs 10.68s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 98.5% vs 30.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.6 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Rilis: 2026-07-21 Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Rilis: 2026-04-21
Skor 9.9 4.9
Peringkat #1 #184
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.6 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 98.5% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 1 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 3.955 0.024
Total Biaya $0.831 $0.002
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Harga output $7.500 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total token input 66,293 114,375
Token output 2,000 14,903
Token penalaran 95,464 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 10.11s 10.68s
Waktu respons (maks) 68.03s 36.03s
Waktu respons (total) 222.33s 213.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.6 Flash

medium
Biaya
$0.079
Waktu
47.9s
Token
10,532 tok

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.49s 8,136 474 40,157
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Ling-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneLing-2.6-flashnonevsMistral Small 4mediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumGemini 3.6 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 SollowLing-2.6-flashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowGemini 3.6 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighGemini 3.6 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.5lowLing-2.6-flashnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5high