Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.1 vs 8.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.584 vs $1.694. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) lebih cepat di 9.48s vs 31.49s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 81.8% vs 69.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while costing about 2.9x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Rilis: 2026-07-21 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 high Rilis: 2026-07-16
Skor 8.1 8.1
Peringkat #31 #30
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.5 7.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 81.8% 69.7%
Tes tidak stabil 7 6
Total Run 66 64
Biaya per hasil 4.169 14.116
Total Biaya $0.584 $1.694
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total token input 105,138 129,423
Token output 8,315 8,077
Token penalaran 212,507 352,421
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 9.48s 31.49s
Waktu respons (maks) 43.93s 196.03s
Waktu respons (total) 208.52s 661.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Biaya
$0.023
Waktu
23.6s
Token
9,128 tok

#30 Muse Spark 1.1

high
Biaya
$0.039
Waktu
50.1s
Token
9,423 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.92s 8,562 349 36,039

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan