#24 Gemini 2.5 Flash
medium
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 274.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Ringkasan
Perbandingan benchmark Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM 5.2: Gemini 2.5 Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.2 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.076 vs $0.379. GLM 5.2 lebih cepat di 6.34s vs 15.49s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.8% vs 60.3%.
Model yang direkomendasikan: GLM 5.2 - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.1), lower cost than Gemini 2.5 Flash, and balanced response time.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-06-18
| Metrik | Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Peringkat | #24 | #61 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 69.8% | 60.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 2.701 | 0.628 |
| Total Biaya | $0.379 | $0.076 |
| Harga input | $0.300 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.500 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Total token input | 34,476 | 38,671 |
| Token output | 1,930 | 4,817 |
| Token penalaran | 145,145 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 15.49s | 6.34s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 95.48s | 20.69s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 325.39s | 133.19s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#61 GLM 5.2
none
SVG tidak valid
- Biaya
- $0.033
- Waktu
- 87.7s
- Token
- 7,455 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 8.4 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 492 | 255 | 10,233 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 3.70s | 567 | 313 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 41.01s | 6,669 | 543 | 32,303 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.7 | 9.5 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.55s | 7,263 | 1,958 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 28.44s | 12,522 | 303 | 11,922 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.69s | 14,296 | 1,489 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.06s | 7,257 | 279 | 2,325 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.17s | 7,113 | 204 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 37.34s | 633 | 18 | 80,702 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 6.50s | 696 | 27 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 4.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.86s | 486 | 92 | 1,899 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 4.42s | 480 | 82 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.62s | 615 | 69 | 1,203 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.84s | 642 | 66 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.18s | 558 | 126 | 2,499 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.31s | 618 | 265 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.20s | 5,088 | 234 | 1,140 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.76s | 6,807 | 400 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.76s | 156 | 11 | 919 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.41s | 189 | 13 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
DeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsGemini 2.5 FlashmediumGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisvsGLM 5.2noneStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGLM 5.2noneGrok 4.20mediumvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.2noneSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsGLM 5.2noneDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsGLM 5.2none