#112 Seed-2.0-Lite
none- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 83.8s
- Token
- 2,311 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Ringkasan
Seed-2.0-Lite unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 5.9. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.012 vs $0.019. Seed-2.0-Lite lebih cepat di 2.49s vs 3.37s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 46.0% vs 42.9%.
Model yang direkomendasikanSeed-2.0-LiteIt has the strongest score in this comparison (6.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.2 | 5.9 |
| Peringkat | #112 | #127 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 3 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.228 | 0.230 |
| Total Biaya | $0.019 | $0.012 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.000 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 46,573 | 48,194 |
| Token output | 3,259 | 4,343 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 2.49s | 3.37s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 6.70s | 47.43s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 52.26s | 70.75s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#127 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
none- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 28.4s
- Token
- 4,518 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 5.6 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 2.83s | 8,215 | 410 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.39s | 7,808 | 571 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitenonevsGPT-5.6 LunalowSeed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5highSeed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BnoneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalNorth Mini CodemediumTersedia gratisvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BnoneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemma 4 31BmediumTersedia gratisSeed-2.0-LitenonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumTersedia gratisGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BnoneSeed-2.0-LitenonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bnone