Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.3 vs 4.8. Laguna XS 2.1 memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.008. Laguna XS 2.1 lebih cepat di 1.55s vs 2.98s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 30.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanLaguna XS 2.1It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 1.9x faster than Trinity Large Preview.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Rilis: 2026-07-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 4.8 5.3
Peringkat #179 #156
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.9 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 30.3%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 0.143
Total Biaya $0.008 $0.008
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 91,598
Token output 2,169 13,377
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 1.55s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 19.02s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#156 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
27.6s
Token
4,344 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan