Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Trinity Large Preview unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.8 vs 4.7. Trinity Large Preview memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.008 vs $0.032. Trinity Large Preview lebih cepat di 2.98s vs 9.61s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 21.2% vs 27.3%.

Model yang direkomendasikanTrinity Large PreviewIt has the best score here (4.8), while costing about 4.1x less than Qwen3 Coder Next (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Rilis: 2026-01-27 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Rilis: 2026-02-03
Skor 4.8 4.7
Peringkat #179 #183
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.9 9.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 21.2% 27.3%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.017 0.793
Total Biaya $0.008 $0.032
Harga input $0.243 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Harga output $0.243 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total token input 29,828 148,194
Token output 2,169 19,069
Token penalaran 0 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 2.98s 9.61s
Waktu respons (maks) 14.34s 81.80s
Waktu respons (total) 56.57s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

#183 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
SVG tidak valid
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
300.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan