- Peringkat
- #87
- Total token output
- 120,427
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 28.08s
- Total Biaya
- $2.126
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.224 vs $2.126. GLM 5.2 (medium) lebih cepat di 23.28s vs 28.08s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 65.2% vs 80.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #85
- Total token output
- 61,761
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 23.28s
- Total Biaya
- $0.224
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 9.5x less than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #87 | #85 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| Konsistensi | 9.5 | 8.0 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 63/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 65.2% | 80.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 4 |
| Total Run | 66 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 15.182 | 2.159 |
| Total Biaya | $2.126 | $0.224 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total token input | 106,316 | 37,199 |
| Token output | 79,338 | 12,261 |
| Token penalaran | 41,089 | 49,500 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 28.08s | 23.28s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 140.96s | 101.36s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 421.15s | 488.94s |
| Parameter | ~1T total (~100B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#87 Claude Sonnet 4.6
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
#85 GLM 5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.041
- Waktu
- 195.8s
- Token
- 9,287 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.98s | 789 | 1,046 | 1,093 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.89s | 639 | 497 | 2,634 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 44.4% | 1 | 33.29s | 6,995 | 16,089 | 3,686 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 40.96s | 7,317 | 1,475 | 17,123 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 93.65s | 75,531 | 31,916 | 9,109 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 51.96s | 12,696 | 458 | 4,531 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.90s | 8,676 | 649 | 742 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.44s | 7,149 | 348 | 2,345 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 58.37s | 495 | 24,380 | 22,891 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 45.47s | 551 | 8,188 | 11,606 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.94s | 564 | 256 | 433 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.39s | 498 | 54 | 1,842 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.61s | 792 | 318 | 552 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.90s | 678 | 94 | 1,518 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.31s | 816 | 592 | 646 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.13s | 672 | 536 | 4,822 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.48s | 11,454 | 655 | 351 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.41s | 6,861 | 230 | 550 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.09s | 204 | 3,437 | 1,586 | |
| GLM 5.2 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 34.25s | 138 | 381 | 2,529 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Qwen3.8 27BlowvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsKimi K3maxClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5.2mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5.2medium