- Peringkat
- #103
- Total token output
- 52,237
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 12.88s
- Total Biaya
- $2.089
Claude Opus 4.8 (low) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.8 vs 7.8. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $2.089 vs $2.126. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) lebih cepat di 12.88s vs 28.08s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 80.3% vs 65.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #100
- Total token output
- 120,427
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 28.08s
- Total Biaya
- $2.126
Model yang direkomendasikan
Claude Opus 4.8 (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.8 vs 7.8), while responding about 2.2x faster than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #103 | #100 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 80.3% | 65.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 1 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 13.054 | 15.182 |
| Total Biaya | $2.089 | $2.126 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $3.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $15.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 156,522 | 106,316 |
| Token output | 43,056 | 79,338 |
| Token penalaran | 9,181 | 41,089 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 12.88s | 28.08s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 127.97s | 140.96s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 283.32s | 421.15s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | ~1T total (~100B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#103 Claude Opus 4.8
low- Biaya
- $0.031
- Waktu
- 14.1s
- Token
- 1,345 tok
#100 Claude Sonnet 4.6
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.30s | 834 | 793 | 371 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.98s | 789 | 1,046 | 1,093 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 77.8% | 2 | 7.58s | 10,590 | 3,637 | 809 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 44.4% | 1 | 33.29s | 6,995 | 16,089 | 3,686 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 36.87s | 119,079 | 13,586 | 2,867 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 93.65s | 75,531 | 31,916 | 9,109 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.27s | 10,503 | 310 | 0 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.90s | 8,676 | 649 | 742 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 46.54s | 972 | 23,226 | 4,472 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 58.37s | 495 | 24,380 | 22,891 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.55s | 708 | 231 | 0 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.94s | 564 | 256 | 433 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.78s | 909 | 111 | 221 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.61s | 792 | 318 | 552 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.01s | 894 | 592 | 184 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.31s | 816 | 592 | 646 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.85s | 11,775 | 370 | 35 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.48s | 11,454 | 655 | 351 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.48s | 258 | 200 | 222 | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.09s | 204 | 3,437 | 1,586 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsSeed-2.0-LitemediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.6 PlusmediumClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsKimi K3max