- Peringkat
- #90
- Total token output
- 52,237
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 12.88s
- Total Biaya
- $2.089
Claude Opus 4.8 (low) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.052 vs $2.089. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) lebih cepat di 12.88s vs 41.37s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 80.3% vs 71.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #91
- Total token output
- 370,250
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 41.37s
- Total Biaya
- $0.052
Model yang direkomendasikan
Qwen3.7 Flash (high)
It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 40.5x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low | Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #90 | #91 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 80.3% | 71.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 6 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 13.054 | 0.398 |
| Total Biaya | $2.089 | $0.052 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M |
| Total token input | 156,522 | 116,331 |
| Token output | 43,056 | 12,330 |
| Token penalaran | 9,181 | 357,920 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 12.88s | 41.37s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 127.97s | 431.47s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 283.32s | 910.11s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | ~35B total (~3B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#90 Claude Opus 4.8
low- Biaya
- $0.031
- Waktu
- 14.1s
- Token
- 1,345 tok
#91 Qwen3.7 Flash
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 600.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.30s | 834 | 793 | 371 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 10.21s | 672 | 713 | 13,968 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 77.8% | 2 | 7.58s | 10,590 | 3,637 | 809 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 8.2 | 9.7 | 66.7% | 0 | 58.84s | 7,893 | 503 | 62,350 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 36.87s | 119,079 | 13,586 | 2,867 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 6.9 | 5.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 231.97s | 88,896 | 9,866 | 203,866 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.27s | 10,503 | 310 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 20.10s | 7,782 | 270 | 10,800 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 46.54s | 972 | 23,226 | 4,472 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 34.43s | 780 | 59 | 35,675 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.55s | 708 | 231 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 10.73s | 516 | 120 | 3,898 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.78s | 909 | 111 | 221 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.41s | 699 | 97 | 7,838 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.01s | 894 | 592 | 184 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 7.1 | 5.1 | 77.8% | 2 | 10.79s | 696 | 369 | 10,474 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.85s | 11,775 | 370 | 35 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.72s | 8,193 | 309 | 1,436 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.48s | 258 | 200 | 222 | |
| Qwen3.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.70s | 204 | 24 | 7,615 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsSeed-2.0-LitemediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGPT-5.6 TerramediumGPT-5.6 TerramediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5.2mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash Litemedium