- Peringkat
- #143
- Total token output
- 69,489
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 17.13s
- Total Biaya
- $3.787
Claude Opus 4.8 (low) vs Qwen3.5-27B
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.2 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5-27B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.116 vs $3.787. Qwen3.5-27B lebih cepat di 9.98s vs 17.13s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.3% vs 47.8%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #139
- Total token output
- 36,422
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 9.98s
- Total Biaya
- $0.116
Model yang direkomendasikan
Claude Opus 4.8 (low)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low | Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Peringkat | #143 | #139 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 78.3% | 47.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 2 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 23.669 | 1.153 |
| Total Biaya | $3.787 | $0.116 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.195 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $1.560 / 1M |
| Total token input | 409,947 | 283,977 |
| Token output | 46,060 | 36,422 |
| Token penalaran | 23,429 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 17.13s | 9.98s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 127.97s | 124.53s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 394.01s | 229.52s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | 27B |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#143 Claude Opus 4.8
low- Biaya
- $0.031
- Waktu
- 14.1s
- Token
- 1,345 tok
#139 Qwen3.5-27B
none- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 42.9s
- Token
- 4,273 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 110.68s | 253,425 | 3,004 | 14,248 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 124.53s | 181,652 | 12,099 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.30s | 834 | 793 | 371 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 4.8 | 10.0 | 25.0% | 0 | 788ms | 696 | 267 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 77.8% | 2 | 7.58s | 10,590 | 3,637 | 809 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 5.8 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.80s | 7,913 | 415 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 36.87s | 119,079 | 13,586 | 2,867 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 39.43s | 74,756 | 22,190 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.27s | 10,503 | 310 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.43s | 7,794 | 243 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 46.54s | 972 | 23,226 | 4,472 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 634ms | 798 | 17 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.55s | 708 | 231 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.51s | 522 | 126 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.78s | 909 | 111 | 221 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.03s | 711 | 69 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.01s | 894 | 592 | 184 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 6.7 | 7.9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1.38s | 714 | 683 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.85s | 11,775 | 370 | 35 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.54s | 8,211 | 303 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.48s | 258 | 200 | 222 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 599ms | 210 | 10 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumTersedia gratisClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsLongCat 2.0mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-27BnoneLongCat 2.0highvsQwen3.5-27BnoneGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.5-27BnonevsGrok 4.7mediumClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsQwen3.5-27Bnone