#16 Claude Opus 4.7
medium- Biaya
- $0.059
- Waktu
- 26.8s
- Token
- 2,475 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5
Ringkasan
Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.7 vs 8.6. GLM 5 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.228 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) lebih cepat di 4.73s vs 33.54s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 82.5% vs 82.5%.
Model yang direkomendasikanClaude Opus 4.7 (medium)It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 7.1x faster than GLM 5 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium | GLM 5 GLM 5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Peringkat | #16 | #18 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 82.5% | 82.5% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 4 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 3.991 | 1.668 |
| Total Biaya | $0.679 | $0.228 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $0.600 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $1.920 / 1M |
| Total token input | 65,406 | 35,224 |
| Token output | 11,858 | 21,570 |
| Token penalaran | 2,198 | 102,996 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 4.73s | 33.54s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 23.18s | 99.85s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 94.51s | 435.99s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#18 GLM 5
medium- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 20.7s
- Token
- 2,068 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 12.96s | 10,635 | 7,629 | 1,114 | |
| GLM 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 74.30s | 7,254 | 2,997 | 52,930 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsDeepSeek V4 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.2highGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGLM 5medium