Classement Appel d'outils
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Appel d'outils, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Tests corrects ↓.
442/442
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Appel d'outils | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #181 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.132 | 1/1 | 18.3s |
| #182 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.158 | 1/1 | 3.80s | |
| #185 | Step 5 Preview high | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.7 | $4.513 | 1/1 | 4.34s |
| #186 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.152 | 1/1 | 4.60s |
| #187 | Grok 4.6 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.781 | 1/1 | 14.4s |
| #188 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.254 | 1/1 | 4.99s | |
| #189 | Muse Glimmer 30B low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.219 | 1/1 | 5.04s |
| #190 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.153 | 1/1 | 4.55s | |
| #193 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.049 | 1/1 | 4.43s |
| #194 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.909 | 1/1 | 4.67s |
| #195 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/1 | 5.35s |
| #196 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.594 | 1/1 | 8.92s |
| #197 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 1/1 | 10.3s |
| #200 | GPT-6 Sol none | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.551 | 1/1 | 3.43s |
| #201 | Space Bunny Alpha max | Stealth | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 5.58s |