Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.3. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.032 vs $0.166. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 9.61s vs 142.59s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while costing about 5.3x less than GLM 4.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.7 4.3
Rank #202 #210
Reliability 10.0 7.8
Consistency 9.0 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 3 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.793 4.147
Total Cost $0.032 $0.166
Input Price $0.110 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 148,194 79,051
Output Tokens 19,069 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 374,109
Response Time (avg) 9.61s 142.59s
Response Time (max) 81.80s 1539.97s
Response Time (total) 153.69s 1996.21s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#210 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair