Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5 (medium)

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.307. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.307
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.7), while costing about 1.6x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.4 7.7
Rank #67 #49
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 78.8%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.582 1.668
Total Cost $0.197 $0.307
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,983 35,224
Output Tokens 12,446 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 0 102,996
Response Time (avg) 4.52s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 99.52s 435.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#49 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair