Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 6.6 vs 6.6. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.125 vs $0.231. Qwen3.6 Max Preview is faster at 7.82s vs 9.34s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 59.1%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 1.8x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.6 6.6
Rank #107 #105
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 59.1%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 2.061 1.421
Total Cost $0.231 $0.125
Input Price $1.040 / 1M $0.793 / 1M
Output Price $6.240 / 1M $2.491 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,339 112,359
Output Tokens 19,257 14,340
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.82s 9.34s
Response Time (max) 102.62s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 172.01s 205.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#107 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

#105 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair