Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.2

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $0.741. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 44.97s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#127
Total Output Tokens
636,949
Response Time (avg)
44.97s
Total Cost
$0.741
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.078
Recommended model GLM 5.2

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.8), while costing about 9.6x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.8 6.7
Rank #127 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 63.6%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.797 1.312
Total Cost $0.741 $0.078
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $0.490 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $1.540 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,050 112,458
Output Tokens 20,026 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 616,923 0
Response Time (avg) 44.97s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 578.13s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 989.32s 212.38s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#127 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

#136 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair