Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B vs MiMo-V2.5 benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.6 vs 4.9. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.028. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 2.20s vs 3.72s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5 - Its score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.6), while costing about 4.2x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.6 4.9
Rank #118 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 27.0%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.467 0.413
Total Cost $0.028 $0.007
Input Price $0.290 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $3.200 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 52,721 41,985
Output Tokens 3,812 2,267
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.72s 2.20s
Response Time (max) 11.82s 6.86s
Response Time (total) 78.08s 46.21s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#118 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

#143 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.5 8.0 16.7% 1 2.19s 645 282 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.36s 15,075 330 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.01s 7,758 366 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 756ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
MiMo-V2.5 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 6.86s 498 81 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 751ms 684 72 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 2.13s 678 166 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 8,238 231 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.89s 216 16 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair