Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Nemotron 3 Super (medium) vs Qwen3.6 27B

Nemotron 3 Super (medium) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.5. Nemotron 3 Super (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.050 vs $0.067. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 51.99s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#151
Total Output Tokens
117,224
Response Time (avg)
51.99s
Total Cost
$0.050
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
16,155
Response Time (avg)
10.65s
Total Cost
$0.067
Recommended model Qwen3.6 27B

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.5 vs 5.7), while responding about 4.9x faster than Nemotron 3 Super (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3 Super Nemotron 3 Super medium Release: 2026-03-11 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.7 5.5
Rank #151 #164
Reliability 8.7 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.004 1.220
Total Cost $0.050 $0.067
Input Price $0.085 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 81,429 95,796
Output Tokens 18,371 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 98,853 0
Response Time (avg) 51.99s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 431.98s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 1039.89s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#151 Nemotron 3 Super

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
272.6s
Tokens
5,296 tok

#164 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Super 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 147.32s 2,275 797 4,424
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair