Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.8. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.080 vs $0.106. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 26.13s vs 63.29s, with pass rates of 71.4% vs 68.3%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5-Pro - It has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 2.4x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.8 7.4
Rank #70 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.4% 68.3%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.871 2.541
Total Cost $0.080 $0.106
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 38,926 40,854
Output Tokens 2,088 5,015
Reasoning Tokens 294,598 97,742
Response Time (avg) 63.29s 26.13s
Response Time (max) 234.29s 130.77s
Response Time (total) 1265.85s 548.65s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#70 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

#51 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 59.11s 672 383 32,992
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.26s 621 323 1,179
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.78s 14,934 483 8,270
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 53.36s 15,060 348 11,870
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 56.99s 6,061 235 16,237
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 18.81s 7,746 260 8,383
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 146.50s 581 58 43,615
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 37.87s 630 275 17,023
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 40.05s 516 99 38,486
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.5 10.0 0.0% 0 4.02s 492 155 163
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 63.49s 699 98 14,139
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 2.77s 672 82 803
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 27.61s 381 89 12,457
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.7 7.9 55.6% 1 5.31s 660 540 2,181
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.33s 8,193 309 1,284
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 16.87s 8,220 311 2,908
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 48.98s 204 32 37,037
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 12.46s 210 1,941 2,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair