Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.8. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.080. Gemini 3 Flash Preview is faster at 1.65s vs 63.29s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 71.4%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash PreviewIt has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 3.3x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.9 6.8
Rank #84 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 71.4%
Flaky tests 2 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.186 0.871
Total Cost $0.025 $0.080
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,011 38,926
Output Tokens 1,885 2,088
Reasoning Tokens 0 294,598
Response Time (avg) 1.65s 63.29s
Response Time (max) 3.56s 234.29s
Response Time (total) 23.07s 1265.85s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#84 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.6s
Tokens
981 tok

#87 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 8,122 453 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair