Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 6.8 vs 6.8. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.080 vs $0.220. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 is faster at 10.81s vs 63.29s, with pass rates of 71.4% vs 71.4%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5It has the best score here (6.8), while responding about 5.9x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.8 6.8
Rank #89 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.3 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.4% 71.4%
Flaky tests 7 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.992 0.871
Total Cost $0.220 $0.080
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,749 38,926
Output Tokens 63,338 2,088
Reasoning Tokens 0 294,598
Response Time (avg) 10.81s 63.29s
Response Time (max) 53.57s 234.29s
Response Time (total) 227.02s 1265.85s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
29.0s
Tokens
3,439 tok

#87 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair