Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5-Flash (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.2. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.139 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 84.82s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#87
Total Output Tokens
117,518
Response Time (avg)
9.93s
Total Cost
$1.079
Rank
#125
Total Output Tokens
502,894
Response Time (avg)
84.82s
Total Cost
$0.139
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash

It has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 8.5x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.0 6.2
Rank #87 #125
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 1.361
Total Cost $1.079 $0.139
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 118,499
Output Tokens 117,518 12,284
Reasoning Tokens 0 490,610
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 84.82s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 515.38s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#125 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair