Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

Step 3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 6.8. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.080 vs $1.148. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) is faster at 63.29s vs 64.46s, with pass rates of 71.4% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-Flash (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 7.1), while costing about 14.4x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 6.8 7.1
Rank #87 #79
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.4% 63.5%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.871 10.434
Total Cost $0.080 $1.148
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 38,926 38,391
Output Tokens 2,088 991,355
Reasoning Tokens 294,598 0
Response Time (avg) 63.29s 64.46s
Response Time (max) 234.29s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 1265.85s 1353.57s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

#79 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair