Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Step 3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

GLM 5.1 (medium) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 6.9. GLM 5.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.535 vs $1.207. GLM 5.1 (medium) is faster at 46.77s vs 64.68s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
1,032,395
Response Time (avg)
64.68s
Total Cost
$1.207
Rank
#82
Total Output Tokens
152,552
Response Time (avg)
46.77s
Total Cost
$0.535
Recommended model GLM 5.1 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.1), while costing about 2.3x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.9 7.1
Rank #94 #82
Reliability 10.0 8.3
Consistency 8.0 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 10.973 4.202
Total Cost $1.207 $0.535
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.150 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,691 82,623
Output Tokens 1,032,395 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 0 136,463
Response Time (avg) 64.68s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 364.99s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 1423.01s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

#82 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair