Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Step 3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Plus leads on average score with 7.2 vs 6.9. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.207. Qwen3.7 Plus is faster at 12.09s vs 64.68s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.09s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
1,032,395
Response Time (avg)
64.68s
Total Cost
$1.207
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 11.4x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.2 6.9
Rank #79 #94
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 63.6%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.014 10.973
Total Cost $0.106 $1.207
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.280 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,824 98,691
Output Tokens 58,097 1,032,395
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.09s 64.68s
Response Time (max) 206.03s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 265.89s 1423.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

#94 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair