Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.3 Chat vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

GPT-5.3 Chat leads on average score with 7.5 vs 6.9. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.187 vs $0.571. GPT-5.3 Chat is faster at 6.88s vs 33.92s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.3 ChatIt has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 4.9x faster than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-5.3 Chat GPT-5.3 Chat none Release: 2026-03-03 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.5 6.9
Rank #62 #92
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 66.7%
Flaky tests 5 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.387 3.218
Total Cost $0.571 $0.187
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,990 139,883
Output Tokens 30,854 15,521
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,992
Response Time (avg) 6.88s 33.92s
Response Time (max) 18.33s 197.54s
Response Time (total) 151.31s 746.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#62 GPT-5.3 Chat

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
8.1s
Tokens
634 tok

#92 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.3 Chat 5.6 4.7 55.6% 2 10.52s 7,302 6,632 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 92.07s 6,543 780 51,218

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair