Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 3.8. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.032 vs $0.036. Qwen3 Coder Next (medium) is faster at 9.61s vs 82.24s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3 Coder Next (medium)It has the best score here (4.7), while responding about 8.6x faster than Qwen3.5-9B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B medium Release: 2026-03-02 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium Release: 2026-02-03
Score 3.8 4.7
Rank #220 #202
Reliability 5.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 27.3%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.187 0.793
Total Cost $0.036 $0.032
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.110 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 17,070 148,194
Output Tokens 29,045 19,069
Reasoning Tokens 209,516 0
Response Time (avg) 82.24s 9.61s
Response Time (max) 226.38s 81.80s
Response Time (total) 1315.88s 153.69s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#220 Qwen3.5-9B

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
35.9s
Tokens
3,030 tok

#202 Qwen3 Coder Next

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 100.88s 2,396 7,890 41,129
Qwen3 Coder Next 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 924ms 7,185 336 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair