Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.106. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 12.72s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#138
Total Output Tokens
86,614
Response Time (avg)
12.72s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #138 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.578 0.935
Total Cost $0.106 $0.062
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,521 139,788
Output Tokens 86,614 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.72s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 209.15s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 279.90s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair