Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

Summary

Step 3.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.3. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.070 vs $0.401. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) is faster at 72.53s vs 72.57s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 54.0%.

Recommended modelStep 3.5 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (6.6), while costing about 5.8x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 6.3 6.6
Rank #108 #98
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 54.0%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 60
Cost per result 5.162 0.198
Total Cost $0.401 $0.070
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,196 34,431
Output Tokens 40,630 91,587
Reasoning Tokens 353,577 195,973
Response Time (avg) 72.57s 72.53s
Response Time (max) 409.98s 453.94s
Response Time (total) 1524.04s 1015.47s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

#98 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair