Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.837. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.58s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewIt has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 16.2x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.4 6.2
Rank #116 #130
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 66.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.431 9.130
Total Cost $0.052 $0.837
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,942 130,388
Output Tokens 14,292 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 1.58s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 34.72s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#116 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair