Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.0. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.108 vs $0.646. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low) is faster at 16.70s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (low)It has the best score here (6.5), while responding about 10.4x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Release: 2026-03-03 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 6.5 6.0
Rank #114 #141
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 10.0 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 51.5%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 4.969 0.540
Total Cost $0.646 $0.108
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,185 65,707
Output Tokens 14,717 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 397,483 293,993
Response Time (avg) 16.70s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 309.35s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 367.47s 2613.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
3.7s
Tokens
1,203 tok

#141 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 8,138 660 1,060
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair