Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.0. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.108 vs $0.122. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is faster at 13.56s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 12.8x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 6.1 6.0
Rank #119 #123
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 8.7 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 51.5%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.636 0.540
Total Cost $0.122 $0.108
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,468 65,707
Output Tokens 51,487 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 0 293,993
Response Time (avg) 13.56s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 206.05s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 298.31s 2613.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#119 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

#123 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair