Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.122 vs $0.249. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 5.04s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Luna (low)It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #111 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 43.9%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.490 1.636
Total Cost $0.249 $0.122
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 96,346 94,468
Output Tokens 8,211 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 17,227 0
Response Time (avg) 5.04s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 19.44s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 110.88s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

#119 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair