Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Claude Sonnet 5 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.249 vs $0.548. GPT-5.6 Luna (low) is faster at 5.04s vs 6.04s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 56.1%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 Luna (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 2.2x less than Claude Sonnet 5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 none Release: 2026-06-30 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09
Score 6.3 6.2
Rank #106 #111
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 56.1%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.840 2.490
Total Cost $0.548 $0.249
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 161,035 96,346
Output Tokens 22,511 8,211
Reasoning Tokens 0 17,227
Response Time (avg) 6.04s 5.04s
Response Time (max) 33.39s 19.44s
Response Time (total) 132.85s 110.88s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Claude Sonnet 5

none
Cost
$0.061
Time
53.7s
Tokens
6,172 tok

#111 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 3.67s 10,590 1,864 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair